A brief review of concepts leading to ECC:

Algebraic **Group**: A set G with a single binary operator (+) that maps any 2 elements of G to another element of G. If the + operator is commutative, G is called an Abelian group or a Commutative group. **[**matrix multiplication and quaterion multiplication are **not** commutative; the symmetric group Sn for n>=3 is non abelian – because transformation order of permutations matters; S5 is not solvable https://youtu.be/ebc8EdBNA-E https://youtu.be/h6JBiYeBfC4 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=oM1LD80E7XU . I mention these because the notion of a group became useful and well-defined when non-Abelian groups such as S5 were encountered**]**. For ECC, the groups involved are Abelian.

Algebraic **Ring**: A set R with a two binary operators (+) and (*) that map any 2 elements of G to another element of R. Every Ring is an Abelian group with respect to (+). If it is Abelian with respect to (*) then it is called a Commutative Ring. Note the absence of inverse or division requirement. **[**In Zp below, if p were not prime, then one would have a Ring instead of a Field because inverses would not always exist.**]**

Algebraic **Field**: A set F with a two binary operators (+) and (*) that map any 2 elements of F to another element of F; where (+) and (*) are **both** commutative; and where each element of F has a unique *inverse* with respect to (*), which is also in F. The set of Rationals form a Field, the set of Integers do not.

**Polynomial**: A construct consisting of repeated applications of (+) and (*) on elements of a Field (which by definition of a Field returns another element of the Field ). The set of polynomials forms a Ring.

**Closed Field**: If the **roots** of every polynomial on a Field belong to the Field, it is a Closed Field. The set of Complex numbers form a Closed Field, the set of Reals do not. [A Field extension can be used to extend a non-Closed Field to a Closed Field].

Algebraic **Finite Field**: A Field with finite number of elements. It is not a Closed Field, but satisfies other properties of a Field, specifically that multiplication is invertible. The number of elements of the Finite Field is called its *order*. An example is the modulus field, obtained by modulo division by a prime number P. Note that exponentiation on a finite field generates a distribution of all the numbers in the sequence less than the order – for large values of an exponent it produces an highly irregular distribution. This makes the inverse operation of discrete logarithm a hard problem. The inverse of a specific element ‘a’ of a finite field of order **n** is a^(n-2), by Fermat’s little theorem.

**Galois Field**: Same as above, a finite Field. Finite fields have order p^{k}, where p is a prime and k an integer>=1. All finite **fields** of a given **order** are isomorphic. In a **field** of **order** p^{k}, adding p copies of any **element** always results in zero; that is, the characteristic of the **field** is p. If a finite field had a non-prime order with different factors that would imply that different elements of the field could be added to themselves a different number of times to give 0, but each element of a field must have the same characteristic . We met a GF (*2*^{8}) in AES S-boxes.

**Elliptic-Curve (over reals)**: A cubic equation, arises in calculation of arclength of an ellipse and naturally has a group property, where two elements on the curve map to a third element also on the curve. See here. The group property is used to define EC-addition (A+B), EC-doubling (A+A) and EC-scalar-multiplication (A+A+..A = kA). This is the group operation on Elliptic curves, a reasonable explanation of why it exists is here. These two operations are defined in more detail- http://www.coindesk.com/math-behind-bitcoin/ . Lets observe that they are distinct from, but dependent on the underlying field properties. The EC operations are maps on tuples or points. In history of elliptic curves it notes that whereas ellipses are quadratic, elliptic curves are cubic or quartic, attributing the name linkage to Wallis. It also notes the tangent-secant method of Diophantus in using two **rational** solutions of a cubic to find a third **rational** solution (later proved to be an Abelian Algebraic Group: points A and B on a curve map to a third point C, and one defines Group addition with A+B =-C, where the – is reflection around x-axis. https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/53974/when-adding-two-points-on-an-elliptic-curve-why-flip-over-the-x-axis makes the argument using symmetry of A,B,C; important thing is this ‘addition’ is not a linear operation). For a tangent, look at Frey Elliptic curves and Tate’s review with its discussion on isogenies.

**Elliptic-Curve over a Field:** The set of points (tuples) belonging to a field F that satisfy an elliptic curve equation (y*y = x*x*x+a*x+b) with the (+) and (*) defined according to the field. Again the name elliptic curve arises because this equation comes up when calculating the arclength of the ellipse; the actual plot of this over different fields does not look like a curve let alone an ellipse. What’s interesting is that the Group property noted above is retained over different Fields.

**Elliptic-Curve over a Finite Field: **Tuples drawn from a Finite Field F, that satisfy the elliptic curve equation (y^2 = x^3+ax+b).

**Elliptic-Curve Crypto**: Built on the hardness of solving the discrete logarithm problem: Given an elliptic curve E defined over a finite field Fq of order(=size) n, a point P ∈ E(Fq ), and a point Q ∈ E(Fq ), find the integer k ∈ [0,n −1] such that Q = k P. The integer k is called the discrete logarithm of Q to the base P, denoted by k = logP Q. This is asking for an inverse operation

In the Bitcoin implementation of ECDSA, the finite field is a prime modulus field Zp and the EC equation is y^2 (mod p) = x^3+7 (mod p). Zp uses the prime modulus p=2^256 – 2^32 – 977 = 115792089237316195423570985008687907853269984665640564039457584007908834671663. A 256 bit integer has (2^10)^25.6 or 3*25.6~77 digit numbers. So two 256 bit numbers are mapped to a third 256 bit number. Sounds good for encryption- but how is this inverted? It is not: one of the first numbers, the scalar multipler k, is the private key. This 256-bit scalar private key is multiplied with a Generator Point G to arrive at a public key, with a 256bit x and y coordinates for a a 512-bit public key. From the kG, the private key k cannot be derived; the strength depends on this irreversibility. The “curve” on the finite field is highly discontinuous and an example is shown here.

So how do we generate and verify a signature – an ECDSA ? This math is a layer on top of the preceding maps for generating keypairs. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elliptic_Curve_Digital_Signature_Algorithm#Correctness_of_the_algorithm for details and some implementation weaknesses. Openssl operations on EC based keypairs are described here – https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Command_Line_Elliptic_Curve_Operations. The size of the keys for EC are smaller than the size of RSA keys for equivalent security. Since the size of a signature is the same as the size of the key in bits, this means the EC signatures are shorter in size than RSA signatures. A 256 bit EC key takes 32bytes, compared to 512bytes for a (roughly) comparable 4096 bit RSA key.

Other elliptic curves on finite fields, including on F(2^m) are described in http://www.secg.org/sec2-v2.pdf.

The **cryptol** verification software has been used to find bugs in the implementation of a Elliptic Curve Crypto implementations. Implementation errors can dramatically impact security properties of crypto that appears mathematically sound.

Note that a Group sounds like a simpler structure than a Field, but a Galois Group is a more complex structure than a Galois Field. https://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Permutation_group https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/45893/how-to-find-the-galois-group-of-a-polynomial